"Kalikala Sahitya Sarvagna Pandita", king Parakramabahu II of ancient Dambadeniya.

Leave a Comment


Literature and education is not something distinctive for professional artists or writers. In this regard, the well-read, king Parakramabahu II of Dambadeniya is the best affirmation, who was bestowed the honorary title of "Kalikala Sahitya Sarvagna Pandita". Inevitably, the term ‘panditha’ implies that king Parakramabahu was well learned while the term ‘sahithya’ bring in to light his inclination to literature.  He succeeded his father Vijayabahu III to Dambadeniya kingdom and was succeeded by his son Vijayabahu IV. The reign of Parakramabahu II lasted from 1234-1269AD. He is a king who was noted both to his determination to fight the Magha invaders who had captured Polonnaruwa and to his devotion to carryon processions in honor of the Sarvagna Dathu. As the Mahavamsa mentions, accompanied by great processions, the Buddha relics were brought to Jambudroni. The king’s high concern and respect for the Buddha relics, prompted him to build a mansion near his palace to house the relics so that he can worship them whenever needed. Once the king arranged a splendor procession and he placed the tooth relic in his hand and in the presence of the Sangha, performed a passive resistance. His yearning was to defeat the Tamil invader Magha who was occupied in destroying Buddha Sasana and after having overthrown the enemy, to nourish the Loka Sasana. Therefore, his priority was given to the protection of Buddha sasana which was followed by his resolution to put an end to the Magha rule.
Read More

King Mahasen, an embodiment of both merit and demerit.

Leave a Comment

Bad company leads anyone in the wrong path regardless of his or her position, gender, and age. It is common both to an ordinary man and even to a king. If it was a king who was led astray, it endangers a whole community. This is not something peculiar for Sri Lanka, even king Ajasath of India caused patricide following the instructions and guidance of Devadaththa, who despite being a bhikkhu had a growing hostility for king Bimbisara. Similarly, this is what occurred during the reign of king Mahasen of ancient Anuradhapura kingdom, who was preceded by king Detuthis and was succeeded by his son Sirimevan. His name was added to the history as a king who caused an immense demerit to the Mahavihara monastery representing Theravada Buddhism in Sri Lanka, by following the road shown by a bhikkhu named Sanghamithra. But his specialty lies in the fact that Mahasen was not noted only for his demerits. On the contrary, the Mahavamsa mentions in reference to Mahasen that the intelligence ones eradicate the bad company as a poisonous snake and proceed with what he feels to do. As evident by the above account, Mahasen was a king who did both meritorious and de meritorious actions. Strangely, both king Ajasath of India and Mahasen of ancient Anuradhapura kingdom was provoked to move in the wrong path by a bhikkhu. In the case of Ajasath it was Devadaththa while in the case of Mahasen it was Sanghamithra.
Read More

"Mind of Virtue and an Ocean of Gems" - King Buddhadasa of Anuradhapura kingdom.

Leave a Comment

It is worthwhile to throw some light on an ancient king of Sri Lanka, who is described as a "Mind of Virtue and an Ocean of Gems" in the Mahavamsa. Buddhadasa was a King of Anuradhapura, whose reign lasted from 341 to 370 AD. He was preceded by his father Jettha Tissa and was succeeded by his son Upatissa. King Buddhadasa is mentioned in the Mahavamsa as a house for compassion. His rule was marked by the philosophy of Dasarajadharma imposed by the Lord Buddha. The best definition for his compassion over the animals is provided in the Mahavamsa as similar to a father’s mercy to his son. The king was noted not only for his noble character but also for his intelligence. He provided capital for the poor and he is specially noted for his role as an expert physician.
Read More

The invasion of Kalinga Magha and the fall of the Polonnaruwa kingdom.

Leave a Comment

 It is commonplace that the disunity among the natives inevitably makes a state vulnerable, as it keeps them occupied in their internal struggles which has the result of drawing their attention from possible external conquests. A similar event occurred in ancient Sri Lanka, to be more specific, during the Polonnaruwa kingdom. Sri Lanka was marked by the Kalinga Magha invasion in 1215 AD which led to the fall of the Polonnaruwa kingdom along with several other factors which were equally undesirable to the continuity of the kingdom. However, the other reasons aside, the Magha invasion alone can be looked on as a climax point of Sri Lankan history due to two reasons. Firstly, it operated as the immediate cause among a number of long term causes for the collapse of the Polonnaruwa kingdom. Secondly it marked a striking change of the capital of Sri Lanka which was transferred from Polonnaruwa to Dambadeniya.
Read More

Ancient Ruhuna as a base for the resistance movements and as a place of refuge.

Leave a Comment

Every action has a counter reaction which is equally strong and opposite. Similarly, in ancient Sri Lanka especially during the Anuradhapura kingdom Ruhuna remained to be the area from where counter reactions against the occupation of foreign invaders were much heard. Magama is known to be the capital of Ruhuna encompassing the present Thissamaharama territory. Ruhuna holds its importance not for a single reason. Conversely, Ruhuna took on different roles in the history of Sri Lanka which is marked by constant conquests, mostly South Indian. Ruhuna still carries its significance as a place which provided refuge for the ancient Sinhala kings, mostly as a defensive territory to organize the army in hiding, and occasionally as a place from where even the resistance against the ruling native kings had taken place.
Read More

The monarch as the cause for the success or failure of ancient Anuradhapura kingdom.

Leave a Comment

The respective reigns of king Mahinda IV and Mahinda V who was also known by the name of Mihindu V are the best example as to how being a strong, and a considerate ruler can be resulted in the independence of the state and its prosperity while on the other hand, how being a fragile ruler with a backward conduct can lead the kingdom towards destruction and make an object of subordination to an outside power. In ancient Sri Lanka where the monarchical form of rule prevailed, it was the conduct of the monarch which decided both the progress or the destruction of the whole community. It is important to note that king Mahinda IV was preceded by Sena IV and succeeded by his son Sena V and the last king of Anuradhapura was his remaining son Mahinda V.
Read More